ScienceOpen

🌐 Website: https://www.scienceopen.com
📍 Country: Germany
📂 Affiliation: Independent; founded by Alexander Grossmann and Tibor Tscheke
📚 Area(s) of Study (AOS): Multidisciplinary – Life Sciences, Physical Sciences, Social Sciences, Humanities

🧠 Introduction

ScienceOpen is a research and publishing network that offers open access to scholarly articles, including preprints. It provides a platform for researchers to share their work, engage in post-publication peer review, and discover related research through advanced search and filtering options. ScienceOpen aims to promote transparency and collaboration in the scientific community.

🛠️ Key Features & Functions

Open Access: All content is freely accessible to readers.

Preprint Hosting: Authors can upload preprints to share their findings promptly.

Post-Publication Peer Review: Enables community-driven review and discussion.

Advanced Search: Facilitates discovery of relevant research through detailed filtering.

Article Metrics: Provides data on views, downloads, and citations.

Integration with ORCID: Authors can link their profiles for enhanced visibility.

⚖️ Editorial & Ethical Standards

Moderation: Submissions are checked for compliance with basic scholarly standards.

Peer Review: Encourages open, post-publication peer review by the community.

Ethical Guidelines: Adheres to standard publishing ethics and practices.

Licensing: Authors retain copyright and can choose from various open licenses.

💬 User Experience & Community Feedback

Strengths:

  • User-Friendly Interface: Intuitive design for easy navigation and submission.
  • Community Engagement: Facilitates interaction through comments and reviews.
  • Visibility: Enhances discoverability of research through indexing and metrics.

Criticisms:

  • Review Participation: Relies on community engagement, which can vary.
  • Platform Recognition: May be less known compared to other preprint servers.

🗣️ Have experience with this platform? Help others decide.

Share your insights in the comments below. Tell us:

  • 💲 Cost – Was it truly free? Any hidden charges or integration fees?
  • ⏱️ Posting Speed – Was your preprint published quickly after submission
  • 🌍 Visibility – Did your preprint gain views, downloads, or media attention
  • 🤝 Community Interaction – Did you receive feedback, comments, or engagement
  • ⚠️ Concerns – Anything unexpected or frustrating during submission or post-publication?
  • ⭐ Your overall rating – Click here to submit

Your feedback helps other researchers make smarter, more confident decisions. Thank you for contributing to a more transparent publishing community!


The information presented in this review is compiled from publicly available third-party sources, including the platform’s official website, publisher documentation, and independent directories (e.g., COPE, Crossref, ASAPbio). This review is intended for informational purposes only and does not represent the views or official statements of the platform or its affiliates.

↓ Submit your star rating here


There are no reviews yet. Be the first one to write one.

Comments

Leave a Reply

🙋‍♀️ Share Your Experience