Authorea

🌐 Website: https://www.authorea.com/preprints
📍 Country: USA
📂 Affiliation: Atypon (part of Wiley)
📚 Area(s) of Study (AOS): Multidisciplinary – STEM, Social Sciences, Humanities

🧠 Introduction

Authorea is a collaborative writing and publishing platform designed to facilitate the rapid dissemination of scholarly research through preprints. Acquired by Wiley via Atypon in 2018, Authorea integrates writing, data, code, and publishing tools into a single web-based environment. It supports both direct preprint submissions and the Under Review service, which allows authors to post preprints simultaneously with journal submissions, particularly for participating Wiley journals.

🛠️ Key Features & Functions

Collaborative Writing: Real-time collaboration with support for LaTeX, Markdown, and WYSIWYG editors.

Rich Media Integration: Embed datasets, code (e.g., Jupyter Notebooks), interactive figures, and more.

DOI Assignment: Each preprint receives a Crossref DOI, ensuring citability and discoverability.

Under Review Service: Optional integration with journal submissions, displaying peer review timelines.

Version Control: Track changes and maintain a history of document revisions.

Open Access: All preprints are freely accessible to readers worldwide.

⚖️ Editorial & Ethical Standards

Moderation: Basic screening to ensure submissions are scholarly in nature; content is not peer-reviewed by Authorea.

Licensing: Authors retain copyright and can choose from various open licenses.

Permanence: Once posted, preprints become part of the permanent scholarly record and cannot be removed.

Ethical Compliance: Adheres to standard ethical guidelines for scholarly publishing.

💬 User Experience & Community Feedback

Strengths:

• User-Friendly Interface: Intuitive design facilitating easy navigation and collaboration.
• Rapid Dissemination: Quick posting of preprints, enhancing early visibility of research.
• Integration with Journals: Seamless connection with participating journals through the Under Review service.
• Interactive Content: Ability to include dynamic elements like interactive figures and executable code.

Criticisms:

• Limited Community Engagement: Fewer opportunities for post-publication discussion compared to some platforms.
• Moderation Concerns: Basic screening may lead to the posting of content without thorough checks.
• Permanent Posting: Inability to remove preprints may be a concern for some authors.

🗣️ Have experience with this platform? Help others decide.

Share your insights in the comments below. Tell us:

• 💲 Cost – Was it truly free? Any hidden charges or integration fees?
• ⏱️ Posting Speed – Was your preprint published quickly after submission
• 🌍 Visibility – Did your preprint gain views, downloads, or media attention
• 🤝 Community Interaction – Did you receive feedback, comments, or engagement
• ⚠️ Concerns – Anything unexpected or frustrating during submission or post-publication?
• ⭐ Your overall rating – Click here to submit

Your feedback helps other researchers make smarter, more confident decisions. Thank you for contributing to a more transparent publishing community!

---

The information presented in this review is compiled from publicly available third-party sources, including the platform’s official website, publisher documentation, and independent directories (e.g., COPE, Crossref, ASAPbio). This review is intended for informational purposes only and does not represent the views or official statements of the platform or its affiliates.

↓ Submit your star rating here